<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Randy Weber &#187; marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randyweber.com/blog/index.php/category/marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randyweber.com/blog</link>
	<description>a.k.a. World Wide Weber</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 03:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Customer Acquisition Done Right &#8211; B&amp;N</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/10/16/customer-acquistion-done-right-bn/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/10/16/customer-acquistion-done-right-bn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=1268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received the following e-mail on Friday from Barnes &#38; Noble regarding their purchase of Borders&#8217; customer list, why they bought it, what information it contains, how they planned to use it, how it impacts the customer, and how the customer can control the use of this information. I think this is an excellent example [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received the following e-mail on Friday from Barnes &amp; Noble regarding their purchase of Borders&#8217; customer list, why they bought it, what information it contains, how they planned to use it, how it impacts the customer, and how the customer can control the use of this information. I think this is an excellent example of transparency and allowing the customer to control the relationship. It makes me feel good about doing business with Barnes &amp; Noble. Regardless of whether or not B&amp;N was legally required to do this, they did it right.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1269" title="B&amp;N_Borders_letter" src="http://randyweber.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BN_Borders_letter.jpg" alt="B&amp;N_Borders_letter" width="398" height="722" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/10/16/customer-acquistion-done-right-bn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoid Spec Sheet Envy</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/10/09/avoid-spec-sheet-envy/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/10/09/avoid-spec-sheet-envy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplicity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=1246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Why did Apple go with a 3.5&#8243; display when most newer Android devices are moving to 4&#8243; screens? Here&#8217;s one explanation from blogger Dustin Curtis:
I have realized another huge downside of larger screens: when holding  the phone with one hand, I can’t reach the other side of the screen  with my thumb. 
Touching [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1251" title="iPhone versus Android" src="http://randyweber.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/iPhone-v-Android.jpg" alt="iPhone versus Android" width="500" height="306" /></p>
<p>Why did Apple go with a 3.5&#8243; display when most newer Android devices are moving to 4&#8243; screens? Here&#8217;s one explanation from blogger <a title="Dustin Curtis" href="http://dcurt.is/2011/10/03/3-point-5-inches/" target="_blank">Dustin Curtis</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>I have realized another huge downside of larger screens: when holding  the phone with one hand, I can’t reach the other side of the screen  with my thumb. </em></p>
<p><em>Touching the upper right corner of the screen on the Galaxy S II  using one hand, with its 4.27-inch screen, while you’re walking down the  street looking at Google Maps, is extremely difficult and frustrating. I  pulled out my iPhone 4 to do a quick test, and it turns out that when  you hold the iPhone in your left hand and articulate your thumb, you can  reach almost exactly to the other side of the screen. This means it’s  easy to touch any area of the screen while holding the phone in one  hand, with your thumb. It is almost impossible to do this on the Galaxy S  II.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This makes perfect sense and fits in with how Steve Jobs did things. And it also shows how brilliant Apple is when it comes to designing products.</p>
<p>LESSON: When creating products, don&#8217;t give in to spec sheet envy when you know the right answer is something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/10/09/avoid-spec-sheet-envy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Importance of a Comprehensive Term Sheet When Negotiating Partnerships</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/30/the-importance-of-a-comprehensive-term-sheet-when-negotiating-partnerships/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/30/the-importance-of-a-comprehensive-term-sheet-when-negotiating-partnerships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randy Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve worked with business development managers that don&#8217;t believe in creating comprehensive term sheets when putting together a deal. What they end up with is a short summary and a disjointed string of e-mails with all of the details. They say it&#8217;s faster. I say it&#8217;s lazy, it ends up taking longer, and it causes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve worked with business development managers that don&#8217;t believe in creating comprehensive term sheets when putting together a deal. What they end up with is a short summary and a disjointed string of e-mails with all of the details. They say it&#8217;s faster. I say it&#8217;s lazy, it ends up taking longer, and it causes problems further down the line.</p>
<p>From the Harvard Law School Program on Negotiation titled &#8220;<a title="Conflict Management From The Start - Harvard Law School" href="http://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/business-negotiations/conflict-management-from-the-start/" target="_blank">Conflict Management From the Start</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>After reaching an agreement, professionals often rely on their lawyers  to draw up the official contract. Unfortunately, miscommunication  between negotiators and their lawyers often leads to costly mistakes.  Contract terms may not accurately represent the negotiated agreement,  key deal terms could be missing, or clauses might contradict one  another.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The biggest miscommunications happen when the lawyers don&#8217;t have a term sheet to work from. If you just give them a summary, some e-mails, and perhaps the other party&#8217;s standard contract, they have no idea what to do with it. What follows are a long series of questions and back-and-forth on the contract terms. All of which could have been avoided if they&#8217;d had something more structured to work with from the beginning.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done it both ways. A term sheet is always the better, faster way to go. The legal process takes far less time, you end up with a contract that covers what you expected, and you don&#8217;t get blind-sided by anything 6 months into the deal.</p>
<p>You can equate not using a term sheet to trying to launch a new product without having detailed written requirements. That too doesn&#8217;t work so well. Take the time to write everything out and gain agreement on it. You will be glad you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/30/the-importance-of-a-comprehensive-term-sheet-when-negotiating-partnerships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoiding Traps in New Product Development</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/25/avoiding-traps-in-new-product-development/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/25/avoiding-traps-in-new-product-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randy Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=1196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post on The Software Maven that should help all product managers. A nice application of how to use the scientific method and some common logical fallacies to avoid.
When you&#8217;re gathering data to validate your market or product, pay attention to the following:

Confirmation Bias &#8211; &#8220;Are you asking questions to find the truth or to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post on <a title="The Software Maven" href="http://softwaremaven.innerbrane.com/2011/09/one-of-things-i-love-about-being.html" target="_blank">The Software Maven</a> that should help all product managers. A nice application of how to use the <a title="Wikipedia - Scientific Method" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method" target="_blank">scientific method</a> and some common logical fallacies to avoid.</p>
<p>When you&#8217;re gathering data to validate your market or product, pay attention to the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Confirmation Bias &#8211; <em>&#8220;</em>Are you asking questions to find the truth or to prove yourself right?<em>&#8220;</em></li>
<li>Appeals to Authority &#8211; &#8220;Are you listening to experts instead of your customers?&#8221;</li>
<li>Misaligned Motivations &#8211; &#8220;Do you have an emotional connection that is clouding your vision?&#8221;</li>
<li>Overconfidence &#8211; &#8220;Are you&#8230;completely sure you know all the answers?&#8221;</li>
<li>Familiarity &#8211; &#8220;Are you digging to find the real needs that you wouldn&#8217;t hear about otherwise?&#8221;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/25/avoiding-traps-in-new-product-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Little Bets, by Peter Sims</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/18/book-review-little-bets-by-peter-sims/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/18/book-review-little-bets-by-peter-sims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=1166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This book focuses on innovations through slow, trial-and-error approaches. Marketers with the right attitude can benefit greatly from this approach. Those with a “growth mindset” are not afraid to fail. They see challenging themselves and failing as learning opportunities. Using the “affordable loss principle,” marketers should focus on what they can afford to lose rather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book focuses on innovations through slow, trial-and-error approaches. Marketers with the right attitude can benefit greatly from this approach. Those with a “growth mindset” are not afraid to fail. They see challenging themselves and failing as learning opportunities. Using the “affordable loss principle,” marketers should focus on what they can afford to lose rather than what they expect to gain. This allows them the leeway to take smaller initiatives and give them a chance to grow and evolve over time. With this approach, the gains tend to be more evolutionary than revolutionary. But they are much easier to implement and less risky. This is important for marketers working in larger organizations that tend to be more risk averse. I wouldn’t recommend this approach to those creating products in a start-up environment.</p>
<p>Thanks for recommending this Nate.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&#038;bc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;t=worldwidewebe-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as4&#038;m=amazon&#038;f=ifr&#038;ref=ss_til&#038;asins=1439170428" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/18/book-review-little-bets-by-peter-sims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Freemium&#8221; Pricing</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/05/freemium-pricing/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/05/freemium-pricing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=1123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a nice guest post on TechCrunch today by Uzi Shmilovici about pricing for online/software products.
He presents a useful model for determining whether or not free is right for your product.
The thing I found most interesting was the concept of &#8220;the penny gap.&#8221; I hadn&#8217;t heard this before.

“The penny gap”—the  hardest part is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a nice guest post on <a title="Tech Crunch" href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/04/complete-guide-freemium/" target="_blank">TechCrunch</a> today by <a title="CrunchBase - Uzi Shmilovici" href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/uzi-shmilovici" target="_blank">Uzi Shmilovici</a> about pricing for online/software products.</p>
<p>He presents a useful model for determining whether or not free is right for your product.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1126" title="penny" src="http://randyweber.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/penny.jpg" alt="penny" width="200" height="200" />The thing I found most interesting was the concept of &#8220;the penny gap.&#8221; I hadn&#8217;t heard this before.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="padding-left: 120px;"><em>“The penny gap”—the  hardest part is to get your customer to pay you the first penny. This  is why it is so critical to choose your premium features wisely.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Also of note is the idea that the costs for most online products will trend towards free.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8230;Because of declining hosting and bandwidth costs, for  most Internet products the marginal cost today is practically … zero.</em></p>
<p><em>In other words, if the cost to serve a customer (support aside) is  zero, the long-term price of the product in the market will be zero  (because of competitive pressure).</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Check out the post, it&#8217;s very thought provoking.<em><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/05/freemium-pricing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old School Marketing &amp; Product Extension</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/03/old-school-marketing-product-extension/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/03/old-school-marketing-product-extension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 17:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&#038;T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hallmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=1107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing is more old school than direct mail. I ran across a nice example of direct mail and product extension courtesy of Hallmark.

I received this card the other day. It was obviously bulk mail, but I was curious who would shell out for a Hallmark card. So I opened it.
It was AT&#38;T with a 20% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing is more old school than direct mail. I ran across a nice example of direct mail and product extension courtesy of Hallmark.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1110" title="Hallmark envelope" src="http://randyweber.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Hallmark-envelope-225x300.jpg" alt="Hallmark envelope" width="225" height="300" /></p>
<p>I received this card the other day. It was obviously bulk mail, but I was curious who would shell out for a Hallmark card. So I opened it.</p>
<p>It was AT&amp;T with a 20% off coupon for accessories. OK offer.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1112" title="Hallmark AT&amp;T card" src="http://randyweber.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Hallmark-ATT-card1-225x300.jpg" alt="Hallmark AT&amp;T card" width="225" height="300" /></p>
<p>But  the bigger deal is how Hallmark has expanded into direct mail, how the  advertiser recognized the benefit of using Hallmark, and the likely  increase in open rates. Probably worth the extra cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2011/09/03/old-school-marketing-product-extension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Prime is a Huge Opportunity for Logistics Companies</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2010/12/11/amazon-prime-is-a-huge-opportunity-for-logistics-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2010/12/11/amazon-prime-is-a-huge-opportunity-for-logistics-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 06:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Launched in 2004, Amazon Prime is a loyalty program for Amazon.com shoppers that gives them free 2-day delivery on most items and $3.99 next-day delivery. Amazon Prime costs $79 per year.
According to Businessweek, four million online shoppers have signed up for Amazon Prime. These members have increased their purchases 150% since joining the program helping [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1015" title="Amazon Prime" src="http://randyweber.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/amazon_prime.gif" alt="Amazon Prime" width="244" height="75" />Launched in 2004, <a title="Amazon Prime" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/prime" target="_blank">Amazon Prime</a> is a loyalty program for Amazon.com shoppers that gives them free 2-day delivery on most items and $3.99 next-day delivery. Amazon Prime costs $79 per year.</p>
<p>According to <a title="Businessweek - What's in the Box" href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_49/b4206039292096.htm" target="_blank">Businessweek</a>, four million online shoppers have signed up for Amazon Prime. These members have increased their purchases 150% since joining the program helping Amazon to grab market share from both online and offline merchants. For consumers, they get their products faster and cheaper. The combination of an extremely wide product selection, 2-day delivery, no shipping charges, and no sales tax (in many instances) makes it hard for other e-commerce sites to compete with Amazon on price and overall customer experience. It’s also a very hard program for all but the largest, most sophisticated e-commerce players to replicate.</p>
<p>But this difficulty for smaller players creates a huge opportunity for a logistics company to step in to help these companies compete.</p>
<p>If I were a logistics company, I&#8217;d create a white-label version of Amazon Prime and shop it to second-tier e-commerce players. There is no other way for these players to compete with Amazon, so they&#8217;d almost be forced to jump aboard. Whichever logistics company does this will be in position to take market share from their competitors. Plus it reintroduces price competition into the e-commerce space which will benefit consumers. In this case everyone wins &#8211; the e-commerce sites, the logistics provider, and consumers &#8211; except for Amazon which all of sudden finds their hard-to-replicate loyalty program suddenly copied and put into large scale deployment.</p>
<p>Imagine a $100 price tag for the shipping program for the consumer. It’s split 50/50 between the logistics company and the e-commerce site that sells it. For the e-commerce site, it also comes with deep-discounted shipping fees in exchange for exclusivity for anything shipped under the program.</p>
<p>There could be three approaches:</p>
<p>1)      White-Label – The program is only available through the particular e-commerce site that sold it. Much cleaner implementation, but less value if you don’t have enough products to justify someone essentially pre-purchasing shipping in bulk.</p>
<p>2)      Consortium (similar to the idea in the article) – The program can be sold by multiple e-commerce sites and works with all participating sites. The revenue would probably be split differently, maybe 80/20 with the logistics company keeping the bigger chunk. In exchange, the e-commerce sites would get even steeper shipping discounts to offset the loss of upfront money for joining the program. The consumer would benefit from having more low-price, quick delivery options.</p>
<p>3)      Hybrid – The program is available as either a white-label solution or a part of a consortium with the choice being up to the e-commerce site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2010/12/11/amazon-prime-is-a-huge-opportunity-for-logistics-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Learned the Three Most Important Marketing Skills in Liberal Arts Classes, not in Business School</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2010/11/12/i-learned-the-three-most-important-marketing-skills-in-liberal-arts-classes-not-in-business-school/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2010/11/12/i-learned-the-three-most-important-marketing-skills-in-liberal-arts-classes-not-in-business-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 04:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randy Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I was chatting with a co-worker about a Logic class she was taking. This brought back memories from my college days – I minored in Philosophy. It also led to the inevitable discussion about how one’s education applies to their profession. Many people assume that I acquired my Marketing expertise while earning my MBA. Likewise, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/images/view_photog.php?photogid=989" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-935    aligncenter" title="You Can't Always Count on Business School" src="http://randyweber.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/business_school1.jpg" alt="business_school" width="395" height="217" /></a></p>
<p>I was chatting with a co-worker about a Logic class she was taking. This brought back memories from my college days – I minored in Philosophy. It also led to the inevitable discussion about how one’s education applies to their profession. Many people assume that I acquired my Marketing expertise while earning my MBA. Likewise, people often assume that my undergrad and graduate studies in the Social Sciences and Philosophy do not apply to my profession, but they&#8217;re wrong. Here are 3 reasons why:</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal; "> </span></strong></p>
<p><strong>1) </strong><strong>Empathy &#8211; Sociology</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><strong> </strong></span>Empathy is the most important skill for Marketers</span>.</p>
<p><a title="Wikipedia - Empathy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy" target="_blank">Empathy</a> is simply putting yourself in someone else&#8217;s shoes – like a potential customer or partner. For example:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;If I was a potential customer or partner, what problems might I have and how might this company&#8217;s products help me? If they don&#8217;t help me, how do I improve them so that they do help?&#8221;</li>
<li>“Looking at a competing product, how does it benefit me as a customer? If I had to decide between my company’s product and the competition’s, which one would I buy?  What can I do to ensure that my company’s product will win that decision?”</li>
<li>“How do I best explain the benefits of my product to a potential customer in a way that meets their specific needs and solves their specific problems?”</li>
</ul>
<p>This is what Marketing, and in particular Product Management and Business Development, is all about – determining what someone values and figuring out how to provide that value or communicate that value to them. If you don&#8217;t get Empathy, you won&#8217;t be able to do this and you won&#8217;t be a successful Marketer.</p>
<p>Let me say it again: Empathy is the most important skill for Marketers. Where do you learn Empathy? Not in a Marketing class. Don&#8217;t believe me? Look up <a title="Wikipedia - Marketing" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marketing" target="_blank">Marketing</a> on Wikipedia. Then search that page for &#8220;empathy.&#8221; It&#8217;s not there. The closest concept you’ll find to Empathy is Marketing Research. Marketing Research is not Empathy. Marketing Research does not necessarily put you in someone else&#8217;s shoes. If you&#8217;re not already in their shoes, you won&#8217;t know what questions to ask.</p>
<p>So where can you learn about Empathy? In a <a title="Wikipedia - Sociology" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociology" target="_blank">Sociology</a> class. Sociology is great for Marketers because it teaches you how to understand and apply Empathy. You also learn how to keep your own background or biases from getting in the way of seeing other perspectives. The trick is making the leap from using Empathy to understand societal issues to using it for business.</p>
<p><strong>2) </strong><strong>Opportunity Cost &#8211; Economics</strong> (yes, <a title="Wikipedia - Economics" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics" target="_blank">Economics</a> is a Social Science)</p>
<p>If you hear things like &#8220;What do we have to lose by giving this a try?&#8221; to justify a new product or partnership, then you know that this person hasn’t considered the Opportunity Cost.</p>
<p><a title="Wikipedia - Opportunity Cost" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunity_cost" target="_blank">Opportunity Cost</a> is about allocating resources between competing projects. It is the cost related to the next best alternative. If you can only do one thing, which one are you going to do and what are you forgoing to do it? For example, you have to decide between the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>adding a new feature to your most popular product – <a title="Wikipedia - Net Present Value" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_present_value" target="_blank">Net Present Value</a> (NPV) of $5 million,</li>
<li>entering a partnership to resell someone else’s complimentary product – NPV of $8 million, or</li>
<li>launching a new product that appeals to a new market segment – NPV of $10 million.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you chose the partnership (perhaps because you wanted to get to market faster and thought it would be easier to implement), the Opportunity Cost is $2 million. It’s the difference between the new product which is valued at $10 million and the partnership which is valued at $8 million. As long as you understand the implications of this decision and have sound reasons for why you’re doing it (speed to market, easier to implement), then there’s nothing wrong it.</p>
<p>Once Marketers learn how to apply the concept of Opportunity Cost, they’ll make more informed arguments both for and against projects, develop stronger business cases, and make better decisions when choosing between competing projects.</p>
<p><strong>3) Critical Thinking &#8211; Philosophy</strong></p>
<p>Speaking of persuasive arguments, it is hard to be persuasive if you can&#8217;t think through both sides of an issue. Your brain gets a major work-out doing just that in every Philosophy course (particularly in the Logic class that started this whole discussion).</p>
<p><a title="Wikipedia - Philosophy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy" target="_blank">Philosophy</a> is the study of the big ideas like why do we exist, how do you truly know something, and what is right or wrong. It is known for its critical, reasoned, and systematic examination of these ideas. These are extremely difficult concepts to grasp and every issue has multiple, nuanced sides. It&#8217;s enough to start yelling matches and to make your head hurt. Wars are fought over these very ideas. Just as in business, there isn’t always one right answer.</p>
<p>But there is a way to get to the best available answer. Philosophy teaches you Critical Thinking skills:</p>
<ul>
<li>how to ask the tough questions designed to get at the heart of an issue,</li>
<li>how to think through complicated issues with multiple shades of grey, and</li>
<li>how to see things from multiple perspectives while recognizing that your biases can often cloud your viewpoint.</li>
</ul>
<p>Armed with these skills, Marketers make better decisions regarding what types of customers to target, what types of products to launch, or what types or partnerships to pursue.</p>
<p><strong>Final Thoughts</strong></p>
<p>Understanding and applying <em>Empathy</em>, <em>Opportunity Cost</em>, and <em>Critical Thinking</em> are essential skills for Marketers. I learned these skills studying Sociology, Economics, and Philosophy. I use these skills more frequently as a Marketer than those I learned in business school. So the next time you see a BA instead of a BBA or an MA instead of an MBA on someone&#8217;s resume, don&#8217;t assume that the person with the business degree will add more value. Otherwise, you might be overlooking someone that could add a new perspective and significant value to your Marketing organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2010/11/12/i-learned-the-three-most-important-marketing-skills-in-liberal-arts-classes-not-in-business-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talk Less, Say More – A Great Resource for Product and Business Development Managers</title>
		<link>http://randyweber.com/blog/2010/11/06/talk-less-say-more-%e2%80%93-a-great-resource-for-product-and-business-development-managers/</link>
		<comments>http://randyweber.com/blog/2010/11/06/talk-less-say-more-%e2%80%93-a-great-resource-for-product-and-business-development-managers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 03:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplicity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randyweber.com/blog/?p=847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished reading Talk Less, Say More by Connie Dieken. It&#8217;s full of great tips on how to relate to your audience in order to connect with them and ultimately to compel them to act. This book is highly applicable for product management and business development. You’ll learn how to better pitch your concepts, your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-853  alignright" title="Talk Less, Say More by Connie Dieken" src="http://randyweber.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/talk_less_say_more1.jpg" alt="Talk Less, Say More by Connie Dieken" width="158" height="234" />I just finished reading <em><a title="Amazon.com - Talk Less, Say More by Connie Dieken" href="http://www.amazon.com/Talk-Less-Say-More-Influence/dp/0470500867/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0" target="_blank">Talk Less, Say More</a></em> by Connie Dieken. It&#8217;s full of great tips on how to relate to your audience in order to connect with them and ultimately to compel them to act. This book is highly applicable for product management and business development. You’ll learn how to better pitch your concepts, your products, and your company to internal audiences, potential customers, and potential partners.</p>
<p>The book is very engaging and easy to read. But don’t let the simplicity fool you. It’s packed full of great ideas to make you a better communicator that gets results.</p>
<p>The premise of the book is that to be a successful communicator, you need to learn three habits:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Connect</strong></li>
<li><strong>Convey</strong></li>
<li><strong>Convince</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>You have to<em> connect</em> with your audience, so you can <em>convey</em> your message and <em>convince</em> them to act.</p>
<p>Recurring themes throughout the book are that “less is more,” you have to be “likeable,” and three is “the world’s most powerful number.” These simple ideas will take you a long way when applied properly. This book will show you how to do that and more.</p>
<p><strong>Synopsis and Comments</strong></p>
<p><strong>Habit 1: Connecting</strong> &#8211; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">give your audience what they want and value up front so they’ll tune in</span>. There are 3 strategies, each with multiple tactics provided to help you connect.</p>
<ul>
<li>Strategy      1: Stay In Their Moment – Be Fully Present</li>
<li>Strategy      2: Frontload – First Things First</li>
<li>Strategy      3: Goldilocks Candor – The Right Level of Candor Is Crucial to Stay      Connected</li>
</ul>
<p>A large part of this section deals with how to reach and work with difficult people. It’s full of tips that will prove very useful in product management as you try to sell your ideas internally and to get your projects implemented.</p>
<p>There are also great tips on how to read your audience and adjust your presentation accordingly which is very useful in business development.</p>
<p>My favorite tip – you have to know your recipient’s preferred method of communication (PMOC). Use their PMOC, instead of yours, and you’ll increase your chances of getting a response. If you don’t know their PMOC, just ask. Then put it in their contact file and always use this method as your default means of communicating with them. This is especially useful in business development.</p>
<p><strong>Habit 2: Conveying</strong> &#8211; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">manage information by using portion control to get your point across with clarity</span>. The chapter starts off with 10 signs you might be a weak conveyor and tips on how to address the problem. Next up are the 3 strategies, each with multiple tactics provided to help you convey.</p>
<ul>
<li>Strategy      1: The Eyes Trump the Ears – Use the Dominant Sense</li>
<li>Strategy      2: Talk in Triplets – Tap into the Trilogy</li>
<li>Strategy      3: Tell Stories – Gain Longer Shelf Life</li>
</ul>
<p>A great visual example of strategy 1 is the contrast used in before and after pictures by weight-loss companies. Here’s an example from the book:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-855  aligncenter" title="Before and After" src="http://randyweber.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/before_and_after.gif" alt="Before and After" width="317" height="230" /></p>
<p>Strategy 2 is another of my favorite tips – the concept of <em>triplets</em>. The brain is wired to think in 3s. Examples include:</p>
<ul>
<li>“Stop,      drop, and roll”</li>
<li>“Stop,      look, and listen”</li>
<li>“The      truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”</li>
<li>“Hop,      skip, and a jump”</li>
<li>“Blah,      blah, blah”</li>
<li>“Yada,      yada, yada”</li>
<li>And my      own addition: “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” from the <a title="Wikipedia - Three Wise Monkeys" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/See_no_evil,_hear_no_evil,_speak_no_evil" target="_blank">three      wise monkeys</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Things just flow better in 3s. Try it.</p>
<p>One of the tactics for using triplets is to “preload three choices.” Start with the most important item first, the second most important item last, and the third most important item in the middle.</p>
<p>Alliteration is also recommended when telling stories – think Dr. Seuss.</p>
<p>Telling stories is the hardest thing for me to do. But the author gives some nice tips. If you can tell a story about how your product can solve a problem, show some visual examples, rattle off the benefits in triplets, and use some alliteration, then you should have a very powerful and memorable value proposition.</p>
<p><strong>Habit 3: Convincing</strong> &#8211; <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> use to create commitment and influence decisions, actions, and results</span>. The chapter starts off with 10 signs you might be a weak convincer and tips on how to address the problem. It then follows with the 3 strategies, along with their tactics for helping you to convince your audience:</p>
<ul>
<li>Strategy      1: Sound Decisive – Stop Babbling and Backpedaling</li>
<li>Strategy      2: Transfer Ownership – Create Commitment, Not Compliance</li>
<li>Strategy      3: Adjust Your Energy – Start Attracting, Stop Repelling</li>
</ul>
<p>Product Managers and Business Development Managers need to be able to convince their audience in order to sell their products and get the deal done. This chapter helps you to put it all together to do just that.</p>
<p>Strategy 1 – You have to sound decisive. “If you sound like a wimp, you’ll be treated like one.”  The author provides 9 signs that you might have a problem.</p>
<p>Here are some things <span style="text-decoration: underline;">not</span> to say:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;I&#8217;m      not an expert, but&#8230;&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I      could be wrong, but&#8230;&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I      guess what I&#8217;m saying is&#8230;&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I      kind of feel like&#8230;&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I&#8217;m      only an assistant, but&#8230;&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;I&#8217;m      probably the only person who feels this way, but&#8230;&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>For those of you that sit on your hands and bite your lips in meetings, “it&#8217;s crucial to contribute to meetings if you want to convince others to see your viewpoints and act on them.”</p>
<p>Bottom Line: If you ramble, waffle, or never speak up, no one is going to take you seriously.</p>
<p>Strategy 2 is a biggie – transferring ownership.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Transferring ownership means shifting your ideas and decisions to others so they will embrace them and act on them.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>It&#8217;s the difference between others feeling actively involved in their destiny and, therefore, committed to it versus feeling forced to comply. Buy-in leads people to change behaviors, decisions, and actions…</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>People should feel as if they&#8217;re volunteering, not surrendering.</em></p></blockquote>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em> </em></p>
<p>The lesson here is that you shouldn’t shove your ideas down everyone’s throats. Ask for opinions. Find a way to use some of those opinions. Share credit.</p>
<p>Strategy 3 is the hardest one for me to get a handle on. It focuses on your voice, your face, and your body language. Most people don’t pay enough attention to how these things influence people’s opinion of you.</p>
<p>This section is full of great tips. Here are my favorites:</p>
<ul>
<li>Record yourself to see how you sound. Likewise, video      yourself to see how you look (watch it with the sound off).</li>
<li>Use shorter sentences.</li>
<li>Emphasize action verbs.</li>
<li>Use pauses for emphasis.</li>
<li>Don’t suck in your stomach. Breathe deeply from the      diaphragm. This will help to calm you down and make your voice sound      lower.</li>
<li>Maintain eye contact, but try looking at just one eye      and then switch to the other eye.</li>
<li>Keep your lower body still.</li>
<li>Use the power stance – “When standing, keep your feet      about shoulder-width apart. Soften the knees a tad. This is the best      position for the lower body to come across as relaxed but powerful.” Shift      your weight from one hip to the other to mix it up a bit.</li>
</ul>
<p>Remember: <em>connect, convey, convice</em>.</p>
<p>I’ve only scratched the surface of all the great stuff that’s in this book. I highly recommend it to anyone in product management or business development looking for an edge to better sell your ideas, your products, or your proposals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randyweber.com/blog/2010/11/06/talk-less-say-more-%e2%80%93-a-great-resource-for-product-and-business-development-managers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.506 seconds -->

