Archive for the ‘Randy Weber’ Category

Recommendation Technology That’s Not Just For Rocket Scientists

Sunday, May 1st, 2011

My friend Jeb Stone, the smartest guy I know, just launched his new company – Selloscope.

Jeb is one of those rare guys that’s a great data guy and a great marketer. He has the ability to sift through the numbers, make sense of them, and then come up with an actionable plan based on those numbers. Over the course of many years doing analytics work and building propensity models, Jeb has had occasion to study the various recommendation engines out there. He’s come up with something better AND he’s made it accessible to everyone. It’s easy to use and reasonably priced. Here’s how Jeb describes his product:

If you’re familiar with Amazon.com, you may have seen a feature, “Customers who bought this also bought…” Or if you’ve ever used Netflix, you may recall that Netflix will recommend other movies to watch based on what you’ve already seen.

Selloscope does the same kind of thing — help businesses make recommendations to their customers — for smaller sites that don’t have the time or money to develop their own recommendation technology. Selloscope helps ecommerce sites, news and content sites, iPhone apps, and even brick-and-mortar businesses to market the right product to the right user at the right time. Email marketers can even use Selloscope to do all this using nothing but a spreadsheet… no programming required.

I like to say that Selloscope is recommendation technology that’s not just for rocket scientists.

I hope you’ll check out Selloscope. I think you’ll like it.

REVIEW: Music Tunnel KTV Cafe

Thursday, December 23rd, 2010

Another Karaoke joint and another good time. This one’s quite a hike from the city, but it was well worth it. Being in a strip mall in San Jose meant plenty of parking.

Music Tunnel had tons of rooms, excellent sound insulation, and a great sound system. It was clean and comfortable except for the small bathroom, just like seemingly every business around here. They had a cool touch-screen menu for picking songs which worked fine for the two of us, but would have been tricky with more people.

The quality of the music was really good, many also included the video from the original artist’s version of the song. The selection of English songs was good, not great. For example, they didn’t have much classic country (but I’m starting to get used to this). They had plenty of modern pop (which I can’t sing) and a good collection of oldies (Beatles, Elvis, Carpenters).

My friend was having fun with Chinese pop songs that had the actual videos. It was pretty neat.

This is my current favorite Karaoke place in the Bay Area. You should check it out.

Amazon Prime is a Huge Opportunity for Logistics Companies

Saturday, December 11th, 2010

Amazon PrimeLaunched in 2004, Amazon Prime is a loyalty program for Amazon.com shoppers that gives them free 2-day delivery on most items and $3.99 next-day delivery. Amazon Prime costs $79 per year.

According to Businessweek, four million online shoppers have signed up for Amazon Prime. These members have increased their purchases 150% since joining the program helping Amazon to grab market share from both online and offline merchants. For consumers, they get their products faster and cheaper. The combination of an extremely wide product selection, 2-day delivery, no shipping charges, and no sales tax (in many instances) makes it hard for other e-commerce sites to compete with Amazon on price and overall customer experience. It’s also a very hard program for all but the largest, most sophisticated e-commerce players to replicate.

But this difficulty for smaller players creates a huge opportunity for a logistics company to step in to help these companies compete.

If I were a logistics company, I’d create a white-label version of Amazon Prime and shop it to second-tier e-commerce players. There is no other way for these players to compete with Amazon, so they’d almost be forced to jump aboard. Whichever logistics company does this will be in position to take market share from their competitors. Plus it reintroduces price competition into the e-commerce space which will benefit consumers. In this case everyone wins – the e-commerce sites, the logistics provider, and consumers – except for Amazon which all of sudden finds their hard-to-replicate loyalty program suddenly copied and put into large scale deployment.

Imagine a $100 price tag for the shipping program for the consumer. It’s split 50/50 between the logistics company and the e-commerce site that sells it. For the e-commerce site, it also comes with deep-discounted shipping fees in exchange for exclusivity for anything shipped under the program.

There could be three approaches:

1)      White-Label – The program is only available through the particular e-commerce site that sold it. Much cleaner implementation, but less value if you don’t have enough products to justify someone essentially pre-purchasing shipping in bulk.

2)      Consortium (similar to the idea in the article) – The program can be sold by multiple e-commerce sites and works with all participating sites. The revenue would probably be split differently, maybe 80/20 with the logistics company keeping the bigger chunk. In exchange, the e-commerce sites would get even steeper shipping discounts to offset the loss of upfront money for joining the program. The consumer would benefit from having more low-price, quick delivery options.

3)      Hybrid – The program is available as either a white-label solution or a part of a consortium with the choice being up to the e-commerce site.

Mavericks Win 10th Straight Game

Wednesday, December 8th, 2010

Mavericks_v_Warriors_12-7-10

I had the pleasure of attending the Dallas Mavericks v. the Golden State Warriors game at American Airlines Center in Downtown Dallas last night. It’s always great to make it back to Texas to see friends and my favorite home-town teams. Thanks for taking me to the game John. Great seats!

The Mavericks won their 10th straight game by defeating the Warriors 105 to 100. It was an exciting game. The highlight of this game was the unexpectedly good play of the Maverick’s back-up centers – Ian Mahinmi (3rd string) and Alexis Ajinca (4th string). Starting center Tyson Chandler was out with a stomach bug and 2nd string center Brendon Haywood spent a lot of time on the bench with foul trouble. This left the door open for Mahinmi (12 points, 10 rebounds, 1 block, 2 steals, 21 minutes) and Ajinca (3 points, 6 rebounds, 2 blocks, 1 steal, 9 minutes) to impact the game. Before last night, they had only played a combined total of 42 minutes for the entire season.

The Mavericks look really good this year. Not sure if they’re going to be able to beat the Lakers, but they look good enough to go far in the playoffs hopefully avoiding another embarrassing first-round exit.

The Final Big 12 Championship Game Was a Thrill

Sunday, December 5th, 2010
Big 12 Championship Game - Nebraska's in red, OU's in white.

Big 12 Championship Game - Nebraska's in red, OU's in white.

I went back to Dallas to see the final Big 12 Championship Game. It was definitely worth it – got to see the new Cowboys Stadium in Arlington and saw a very exciting game, not to mention getting some of my favorite local eats.

After going up 17-0 in the first half, #13 Nebraska loses a close one to #9 Oklahoma by a score of 23 – 20. This was the second straight year that Nebraska lost a close one in the Big 12 Championship Game. This is Nebraska’s final year in the Big 12. They move to the Big 10 starting next year.

There were about 80,000 people at the game. There seemed to be slightly more Nebraska fans. The place was really, really loud. I’ve never been to a football game with that much crowd noise. Though loud and passionate about their teams, everyone was well behaved. I was a little surprised by this. I was sitting in the lower level around a bunch of Nebraska fans. It was a great experience.

Review: Roku XDS

Thursday, November 25th, 2010

Roku XDS

I give the new Roku XDS a C. Great for video, but terrible for audio.

I picked up a new Roku XDS for $100 at Amazon. I had pretty high expectations after reading some reviews and checking out the product page. I planned to use it to listen to my MP3 collection and Pandora, as well as to stream video from Netflix and Hulu Plus. That’s all I wanted from it. Sounds simple. I figured I’d be able to get rid of my prior generation Apple TV that is only being used to store and play my music. I was wrong.

Video

The Roku really shines with streaming video. When comparing its Netflix interface to that of my Internet-connected Samsung Blu-ray player, the Roku is great. Not only can I access my instant (streaming) queue, but I can also search for movies – something I can’t do with my Blu-ray player. Also, Netflix loads faster, the videos play at a higher resolution, and the UI just seems speedier. Netflix is great on the Roku.

Hulu Plus is also pretty good, but not perfect. There is some overscanning going on, but it’s not enough to worry about. Also, I have to pay extra for it ($7.99/month) which sucks considering I still have to watch commercials. But it’s still better than plugging my computer into my TV.

I recently downgraded my DirecTV package. The combination of Netflix and Hulu Plus are good enough to allow me to stick with the downgrade.

If I had one wish, it’s that Roku would work something out with ESPN so that I can watch ESPN 3 on my TV. I’d pay extra for that. I get it free on my PC as a Comcast subscriber. Currently ESPN only makes it available via deals they cut with ISPs. I can’t buy it as an individual. I hope this changes.

Overall, the Roku gets an A- for video.

Audio

The Roku seriously disappoints here. First of all it doesn’t have a built-in application to play MP3s connected to it via USB or over my home network. The only way to hear my own music is to first upload it MP3Tunes.com. This comes with an annual fee and it takes forever to complete the upload – multiple days for around 50GB of music. But I was willing to give this a shot since this would solve my offsite backup needs for my music.

The UI for MP3Tunes on Roku is terrible – it’s sluggish, under-featured – i.e. doesn’t support browsing/shuffling by genre – and it’s buggy. What’s worse, the service doesn’t  handle playlists well, especially big ones. This is a known bug confirmed by their tech support. The Web-based UI for MP3Tunes is better, but only slightly. It’s still buggy and slow. I hate it and wish I hadn’t wasted my time and money on it.

Pandora works decently well on the Roku, but not appreciably better than on my Blu-ray player.

Overall, the Roku gets and F for audio.

Recommendation

If you don’t care about audio, then by all means get the Roku. You’ll love it. If you want to listen to your own music, this isn’t the device for you. You will be very disappointed. Get an Apple TV instead.

Regarding which model to get, the XDS is great because it has more connections and it has a replay button that is missing on the entry-level model. Spend the extra money for the XDS.

A Cold, Rainy Day in SF. I’d Rather be Here.

Friday, November 19th, 2010

West Texas

I wasn’t digging the weather today in San Fran so I decided to picture myself somewhere else a bit warmer and sunnier. Here’s where I ended up – the Guadalupe Mountains in West Texas. I’m feeling better already.

I Learned the Three Most Important Marketing Skills in Liberal Arts Classes, not in Business School

Friday, November 12th, 2010

business_school

I was chatting with a co-worker about a Logic class she was taking. This brought back memories from my college days – I minored in Philosophy. It also led to the inevitable discussion about how one’s education applies to their profession. Many people assume that I acquired my Marketing expertise while earning my MBA. Likewise, people often assume that my undergrad and graduate studies in the Social Sciences and Philosophy do not apply to my profession, but they’re wrong. Here are 3 reasons why:

1) Empathy – Sociology

Empathy is the most important skill for Marketers.

Empathy is simply putting yourself in someone else’s shoes – like a potential customer or partner. For example:

  • “If I was a potential customer or partner, what problems might I have and how might this company’s products help me? If they don’t help me, how do I improve them so that they do help?”
  • “Looking at a competing product, how does it benefit me as a customer? If I had to decide between my company’s product and the competition’s, which one would I buy?  What can I do to ensure that my company’s product will win that decision?”
  • “How do I best explain the benefits of my product to a potential customer in a way that meets their specific needs and solves their specific problems?”

This is what Marketing, and in particular Product Management and Business Development, is all about – determining what someone values and figuring out how to provide that value or communicate that value to them. If you don’t get Empathy, you won’t be able to do this and you won’t be a successful Marketer.

Let me say it again: Empathy is the most important skill for Marketers. Where do you learn Empathy? Not in a Marketing class. Don’t believe me? Look up Marketing on Wikipedia. Then search that page for “empathy.” It’s not there. The closest concept you’ll find to Empathy is Marketing Research. Marketing Research is not Empathy. Marketing Research does not necessarily put you in someone else’s shoes. If you’re not already in their shoes, you won’t know what questions to ask.

So where can you learn about Empathy? In a Sociology class. Sociology is great for Marketers because it teaches you how to understand and apply Empathy. You also learn how to keep your own background or biases from getting in the way of seeing other perspectives. The trick is making the leap from using Empathy to understand societal issues to using it for business.

2) Opportunity Cost – Economics (yes, Economics is a Social Science)

If you hear things like “What do we have to lose by giving this a try?” to justify a new product or partnership, then you know that this person hasn’t considered the Opportunity Cost.

Opportunity Cost is about allocating resources between competing projects. It is the cost related to the next best alternative. If you can only do one thing, which one are you going to do and what are you forgoing to do it? For example, you have to decide between the following:

  • adding a new feature to your most popular product – Net Present Value (NPV) of $5 million,
  • entering a partnership to resell someone else’s complimentary product – NPV of $8 million, or
  • launching a new product that appeals to a new market segment – NPV of $10 million.

If you chose the partnership (perhaps because you wanted to get to market faster and thought it would be easier to implement), the Opportunity Cost is $2 million. It’s the difference between the new product which is valued at $10 million and the partnership which is valued at $8 million. As long as you understand the implications of this decision and have sound reasons for why you’re doing it (speed to market, easier to implement), then there’s nothing wrong it.

Once Marketers learn how to apply the concept of Opportunity Cost, they’ll make more informed arguments both for and against projects, develop stronger business cases, and make better decisions when choosing between competing projects.

3) Critical Thinking – Philosophy

Speaking of persuasive arguments, it is hard to be persuasive if you can’t think through both sides of an issue. Your brain gets a major work-out doing just that in every Philosophy course (particularly in the Logic class that started this whole discussion).

Philosophy is the study of the big ideas like why do we exist, how do you truly know something, and what is right or wrong. It is known for its critical, reasoned, and systematic examination of these ideas. These are extremely difficult concepts to grasp and every issue has multiple, nuanced sides. It’s enough to start yelling matches and to make your head hurt. Wars are fought over these very ideas. Just as in business, there isn’t always one right answer.

But there is a way to get to the best available answer. Philosophy teaches you Critical Thinking skills:

  • how to ask the tough questions designed to get at the heart of an issue,
  • how to think through complicated issues with multiple shades of grey, and
  • how to see things from multiple perspectives while recognizing that your biases can often cloud your viewpoint.

Armed with these skills, Marketers make better decisions regarding what types of customers to target, what types of products to launch, or what types or partnerships to pursue.

Final Thoughts

Understanding and applying Empathy, Opportunity Cost, and Critical Thinking are essential skills for Marketers. I learned these skills studying Sociology, Economics, and Philosophy. I use these skills more frequently as a Marketer than those I learned in business school. So the next time you see a BA instead of a BBA or an MA instead of an MBA on someone’s resume, don’t assume that the person with the business degree will add more value. Otherwise, you might be overlooking someone that could add a new perspective and significant value to your Marketing organization.

No More Football This Season!

Sunday, November 7th, 2010

flat football

My friends are tired of reading about football on my blog. They want to read more about marketing, products, and partnerships. Normally, I’d keep on writing about football since it’s a passion of mine, but I’m disgusted with the way my favorite teams have performed this season. Both the Longhorns and the Cowboys were blown out this weekend. Both are playing sub-500 football. So with that, I’m done writing about football this season. It breaks my heart.

So What? – A Book Review for Product Management and Business Development

Saturday, October 30th, 2010

So WhatI just finished reading So What?: How to Communicate What Really Matters to Your Audience by Mark Magnacca. This book really opened my eyes. I found it highly applicable for both product management and business development.

The premise of the book is that your message should focus on what your product can do for your customer. There’s nothing new or revolutionary about this idea. In fact, most of it boils down to understanding the difference between features and benefits (it’s benefits that matter), figuring out which benefit matters the most to your customer, and then making sure that they hear it. It’s a good reminder that many marketers need to hear from time to time. But where this book excels is in helping you apply this idea in ways that you might not have thought of. This book is a nice evolution in how you can market yourself, your product, or business.

Key Take-Aways:

1) Your potential customer or partner is thinking “so what?” All your thoughts and efforts as a marketer should be focused on finding the “So What Benefit” for your customer or partner. They don’t care about you, your product, or your company until they know how it benefits them.

Having taken hundreds of phone calls from other companies wanting to partner with my company, I can tell you that this is the only thing I cared about when taking these calls. If the caller couldn’t quickly articulate what was in it for me, then it was over.

2) Think through the “So What Matrix” when giving a presentation:

  • “For What?” – Why are you giving the presentation?
  • “So What?” – Why is it important to the customer?
  • “Now What?” – What do you want the customer to do as a result of the presentation?

I’ve always been been stunned by how many product and partnership proposals I’ve seen that didn’t get these points across.

3) The goal is to get your customer to say:

  • “I love it.”
  • “I need it.”
  • “I’ll buy it.”

4) If you can’t think of a “So What Benefit,” just ask your customer or partner. The author suggests saying the following: “One of the the things that I have found that is really helpful in prioritizing what’s most important is to ask  you to complete the following sentence regarding this product/service.”

“All I really care about is ______________ .”

This is the recommendation that I really like. It’s so simple, why not just ask what someone wants? The problem is that people don’t always want to tell you what they want or can’t articulate it. The author gives good tips on how to get past this.

5) The author suggests creating a “personal biography” – a little about you, your background, what makes you different, and how you can benefit your customer. This helps your customer or partner better relate to you. The book goes into detail on how to do this and provides good examples.

This really changed my thinking in regards to the “about me” section on my blog, as well as my resume, my cover letter, and my personal business cards.

6) Next the author suggests creating a “So What Positioning Statement.” This helps you to answer the question “What do you do?” in such a way that people will easily understand how you can benefit them or other people they know. Most people waste the opportunity every time they are asked this question. The book goes into detail on this.

Answering this question properly isn’t easy to do. The author completely changed my thinking on how to do it.

7) And, finally, the author suggests that once you’ve identified your “So What Benefit,” you have to make sure that your product or service is always visible and consistent, and that your “So What Benefit” is constantly repeated. He calls this the “So What Reminder” – visibility, consistency, and repetition. Don’t assume people will remember your message. Make sure they remember it.